From 3bca6d5704129e4b02f90d416e57aed1f9b16aa7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Daniel Micay Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2020 12:18:55 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] reword Pixel 4 FAQ --- static/faq.html | 14 ++++++++------ 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/static/faq.html b/static/faq.html index 352b3308..e4825e44 100644 --- a/static/faq.html +++ b/static/faq.html @@ -168,12 +168,14 @@

Support for the Pixel 4 and Pixel 4 XL is currently experimental, but those along with the upcoming Pixel 4a will become the recommended devices due to longer support - and incremental security improvements for the device support code and firmware. The - Pixel 4a will end up being the device recommended for most people, especially with the - replacement of the fingerprint scanner with IR-based face scanning. We plan to use the - fingerprint scanner to implement 2-factor unlocking, and while it would be possible to - do the same with face unlock we lack the resources to do both, especially since the UX - design would be significantly different.

+ and incremental security improvements for the device support code and firmware. On the + Pixel 4 and 4 XL, support for fingerprint unlock as a secondary unlock mechanism has + been removed and replaced with IR-based 3D facial scanning. GrapheneOS plans to extend + secondary unlock support with the option of 2-factor authentication using a secondary + PIN or passphrase required for fingerprint / face unlock. It's likely this will be + implemented first for fingerprint unlock, so that's another consideration. The Pixel + 4a will likely have a fingerprint scanner instead of the dual infrared face scanning + cameras.

Which devices will be supported in the future?