From 9bba7f4e65ec00c587435bd808aad4628f6e750e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Daniel Micay Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2024 11:49:23 -0500 Subject: [PATCH] add list of apps banning GrapheneOS via Play Integrity --- .../attestation-compatibility-guide.html | 25 +++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+) diff --git a/static/articles/attestation-compatibility-guide.html b/static/articles/attestation-compatibility-guide.html index fe8ff1e8..9c51ba8e 100644 --- a/static/articles/attestation-compatibility-guide.html +++ b/static/articles/attestation-compatibility-guide.html @@ -119,6 +119,31 @@ into the stock OS without a valid security reason. GrapheneOS not only upholds the app security model but substantially reinforces it, so it cannot be justified with reasoning based on security, anti-fraud, etc.

+ +
+

Apps banning GrapheneOS

+ +

This is a list of the apps banning GrapheneOS with the Play Integrity API with + links to their Play Store pages for leaving feedback:

+ + + +

In addition to leaving feedback for these apps on the Play Store, filing support + requests and leaving feedback on third party review sites. Ask them to stop banning + GrapheneOS and explain that it's a much more secure OS than what they permit which + does not lose any of the standard security model. Explain that they can use the + hardware key attestation API to verify that a device is running GrapheneOS to permit + it alongside an OS licensing Google apps as they do with the Play Integrity API + already. Make sure to push back against false claims that it has something to do + with compatibility or security issues. The only reason they aren't permitting it is + because we do not license Google Mobile Services (GMS) and these apps are enforcing + Google's business interests rather than security.

+
{% include "footer.html" %}