From cde5fee9b609d5e3441d3aa257a9d04e50ee8a28 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Daniel Micay <danielmicay@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2020 00:45:18 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] explain GPLv3 licensing issue

---
 static/faq.html | 8 ++++++++
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)

diff --git a/static/faq.html b/static/faq.html
index 5285a47d..c21a197b 100644
--- a/static/faq.html
+++ b/static/faq.html
@@ -869,6 +869,14 @@
             <p>GrapheneOS is focused on making meaningful improvements to privacy and security,
             and bundling assorted apps into the OS is not only usually outside of that focus but
             often counter to it.</p>
+
+            <p>In some cases, licensing is also an issue. GrapheneOS is permissively licensed and
+            is usable for building devices with an immutable root of trust. GPLv3 is deliberately
+            incompatible with these kinds of locked down devices, unlike GPLv2 code such as the
+            Linux kernel. This means GrapheneOS can't include GPLv3 code without forbidding use
+            cases we want to support. GPLv3 is no problem for our own usage, but we don't want to
+            forbid using GrapheneOS as a replacement for the Android Open Source Project in locked
+            down devices.</p>
         </main>
         <footer>
             <a href="/"><img src="/logo.png" width="512" height="512" alt=""/>GrapheneOS</a>