add anti-theft to FAQ

This commit is contained in:
Daniel Micay 2020-03-09 20:24:46 -04:00
parent 61e3ad9e22
commit f1f2e6e508

View File

@ -96,6 +96,7 @@
<li><a href="#updates">How do I keep the OS updated?</a></li>
</ul>
</li>
<li><a href="#anti-theft">Does GrapheneOS provide Factory Reset Protection?</a></li>
</ul>
<h2 id="device-support">
@ -580,6 +581,32 @@
<p>Updates can be <a href="/usage#updates-sideloading">sideloaded via
recovery</a>.</p>
<h2 id="anti-theft">
<a href="#anti-theft">Does GrapheneOS provide Factory Reset Protection?</a>
</h2>
<p>No, since this is strictly a theft deterrence feature, not a security feature, and
the standard implementation depends on having the device tied to an account on an
online service. The only advantage would be encouraging thieves to return a stolen
device for a potential reward after realizing that it has no value beyond scrapping it
for parts.</p>
<p>Google's Factory Reset Protection ties devices to a Google account using a tiny,
special region of persistent state not wiped by a factory reset. It prevents a thief
from wiping the device to a fresh state for resale without being stuck at a screen for
authenticating with the Google account persisted on the device after wiping.</p>
<p>It would be possible to make an implementation not reliant upon an online service
where the user has the optional to enable Factory Reset Protection and is given a seed
phrase required to use the device after wiping data from recovery. However, since this
has no security value and the ability to deter theft is questionable, implementing
this is an extremely low priority.</p>
<p>Providing the option to disable wiping from recovery would be simpler, but would be
incompatible with features designed to wipe data automatically in certain cases. This
will not be implemented by GrapheneOS since it isn't a good approach and it conflicts
with other planned features.</p>
</div>
<footer>
<a href="/"><img src="https://grapheneos.org/logo.png" width="512" height="512" alt=""/>GrapheneOS</a>