cmd/sharefs: rename fuse-helper to fuse-operations
All checks were successful
Test / Create distribution (push) Successful in 43s
Test / Sandbox (push) Successful in 2m34s
Test / Hakurei (push) Successful in 3m26s
Test / ShareFS (push) Successful in 3m23s
Test / Hpkg (push) Successful in 4m23s
Test / Sandbox (race detector) (push) Successful in 4m38s
Test / Hakurei (race detector) (push) Successful in 5m33s
Test / Flake checks (push) Successful in 1m45s
All checks were successful
Test / Create distribution (push) Successful in 43s
Test / Sandbox (push) Successful in 2m34s
Test / Hakurei (push) Successful in 3m26s
Test / ShareFS (push) Successful in 3m23s
Test / Hpkg (push) Successful in 4m23s
Test / Sandbox (race detector) (push) Successful in 4m38s
Test / Hakurei (race detector) (push) Successful in 5m33s
Test / Flake checks (push) Successful in 1m45s
This is not really just library wrapper functions, but instead implements the callbacks, so fuse-operations makes more sense. Signed-off-by: Ophestra <cat@gensokyo.uk>
This commit is contained in:
@@ -5,7 +5,6 @@ import (
|
||||
"os"
|
||||
"path"
|
||||
"runtime"
|
||||
"syscall"
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
// executableName is the [path.Base] name of the executable that started the current process.
|
||||
@@ -24,8 +23,5 @@ func main() {
|
||||
log.SetFlags(0)
|
||||
log.SetPrefix(executableName + ": ")
|
||||
|
||||
// don't mask creation mode, kernel already did that
|
||||
syscall.Umask(0)
|
||||
|
||||
os.Exit(_main(len(os.Args), copyStrings(os.Args...)))
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user