Feasibility of in-process dbus proxy implementation #12

Open
opened 2025-09-08 03:35:57 +09:00 by ophestra · 0 comments
Owner

The whole interaction around xdg-dbus-proxy is quite ugly, with the whole null-terminated argument pipe thing. It is also the only thing keeping the helper package alive since the removal of bwrap. We might benefit from removing it altogether and implement it in-process.

The whole interaction around xdg-dbus-proxy is quite ugly, with the whole null-terminated argument pipe thing. It is also the only thing keeping the `helper` package alive since the removal of `bwrap`. We might benefit from removing it altogether and implement it in-process.
ophestra pinned this 2025-11-05 22:38:33 +09:00
ophestra removed the
Kind
Feature
label 2025-11-10 01:29:15 +09:00
ophestra added a new dependency 2025-11-12 23:12:09 +09:00
Sign in to join this conversation.
No description provided.