This removes the need for manual splitting. The understanding of the format is robust enough to allow this to happen anyway.
Signed-off-by: Ophestra <cat@gensokyo.uk>
The message in the sample does not correspond to any known method call. The spec does not mention what to do with messages like this, but all existing usage code simply drops it.
Signed-off-by: Ophestra <cat@gensokyo.uk>
This appears to add *one single entry* compared to the message before it. The inefficiency of this protocol is beyond imagination.
Signed-off-by: Ophestra <cat@gensokyo.uk>
Once again, already entirely supported, the offset is not yet fully verified but makes intuitive sense. Will verify this on future occurrences of the message.
Signed-off-by: Ophestra <cat@gensokyo.uk>
