add list of apps banning GrapheneOS via Play Integrity
This commit is contained in:
parent
2e02cd353e
commit
9bba7f4e65
@ -119,6 +119,31 @@
|
|||||||
into the stock OS without a valid security reason. GrapheneOS not only upholds the
|
into the stock OS without a valid security reason. GrapheneOS not only upholds the
|
||||||
app security model but substantially reinforces it, so it cannot be justified with
|
app security model but substantially reinforces it, so it cannot be justified with
|
||||||
reasoning based on security, anti-fraud, etc.</p>
|
reasoning based on security, anti-fraud, etc.</p>
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
<article id="apps-banning-grapheneos">
|
||||||
|
<h2><a href="#apps-banning-grapheneos">Apps banning GrapheneOS</a></h2>
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
<p>This is a list of the apps banning GrapheneOS with the Play Integrity API with
|
||||||
|
links to their Play Store pages for leaving feedback:</p>
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
<ul>
|
||||||
|
<li><a href="https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.revolut.revolut">Revolut</a></li>
|
||||||
|
<li><a href="https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.revolut.business">Revolut Business</a></li>
|
||||||
|
<li><a href="https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.mcdonalds.app">McDonald's</a></li>
|
||||||
|
<li><a href="https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.ubercab.driver">Uber Driver: Drive and Deliver</a></li>
|
||||||
|
</ul>
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
<p>In addition to leaving feedback for these apps on the Play Store, filing support
|
||||||
|
requests and leaving feedback on third party review sites. Ask them to stop banning
|
||||||
|
GrapheneOS and explain that it's a much more secure OS than what they permit which
|
||||||
|
does not lose any of the standard security model. Explain that they can use the
|
||||||
|
hardware key attestation API to verify that a device is running GrapheneOS to permit
|
||||||
|
it alongside an OS licensing Google apps as they do with the Play Integrity API
|
||||||
|
already. Make sure to push back against false claims that it has something to do
|
||||||
|
with compatibility or security issues. The only reason they aren't permitting it is
|
||||||
|
because we do not license Google Mobile Services (GMS) and these apps are enforcing
|
||||||
|
Google's business interests rather than security.</p>
|
||||||
|
</article>
|
||||||
</main>
|
</main>
|
||||||
{% include "footer.html" %}
|
{% include "footer.html" %}
|
||||||
</body>
|
</body>
|
||||||
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user