counter false claims made comparing the OSes

This commit is contained in:
Daniel Micay 2021-04-18 06:01:53 -04:00
parent 8d8825ee05
commit fe558c4082

View File

@ -94,6 +94,33 @@
development not done by them. Substantial damage has been done to GrapheneOS
through an organized campaign of misinformation and harassment.</p>
</section>
<section id="new-copperheados-vs-grapheneos">
<h2><a href="#new-copperheados-vs-grapheneos">New CopperheadOS vs. GrapheneOS</a></h2>
<p>The new CopperheadOS is a shadow of the historical GrapheneOS code. They've
continued copying portions of our newer generation code but haven't developed any
significant privacy or security improvements on their own. It's a poor imitation
of the original. It has a fraction of the privacy and security improvements and
lacks a team with an understanding of how they work. It often doesn't receive
timely security updates. It has serious mistakes compromising user privachy and
security.</p>
<p>CopperheadOS is a paid product and has license enforcement compromising user
privacy and security through tracking devices to implement DRM. They use the
outrageous business model of charging users for security updates rather than
simply selling them the software or devices with it.</p>
<p>GrapheneOS devices can be purchased for a bunch of different companies,
organizations and individuals. Many of these offer customer support. Unlike
CopperheadOS, it's still open source software and you aren't being charged to
simply get the OS updates. Anyone can sell devices with GrapheneOS without
permission from the project due the open source licensing. Many of these sellers
voluntarily contribute back to the project.</p>
<p>GrapheneOS is far more actively developed than the new CopperheadOS and has
substantially more resources available, including significantly more funding.</p>
</section>
</main>
<footer>
<a href="/"><img src="/mask-icon.svg" width="512" height="512" alt=""/>GrapheneOS</a>