Feasibility of in-process dbus proxy implementation #12

Open
opened 2025-09-08 03:35:57 +09:00 by ophestra · 1 comment
Owner

The whole interaction around xdg-dbus-proxy is quite ugly, with the whole null-terminated argument pipe thing. It is also the only thing keeping the helper package alive since the removal of bwrap. We might benefit from removing it altogether and implement it in-process.

The whole interaction around xdg-dbus-proxy is quite ugly, with the whole null-terminated argument pipe thing. It is also the only thing keeping the `helper` package alive since the removal of `bwrap`. We might benefit from removing it altogether and implement it in-process.
ophestra pinned this 2025-11-05 22:38:33 +09:00
ophestra removed the
Kind
Feature
label 2025-11-10 01:29:15 +09:00
ophestra added a new dependency 2025-11-12 23:12:09 +09:00
ophestra added this to the v0.4 milestone 2025-12-19 02:52:25 +09:00
Author
Owner

This is very low priority, removed from v0.4 for now.

This is very low priority, removed from v0.4 for now.
ophestra removed this from the v0.4 milestone 2026-03-17 13:18:25 +09:00
Sign in to join this conversation.