Feasibility of in-process dbus proxy implementation #12

Open
opened 2025-09-08 03:35:57 +09:00 by ophestra · 1 comment
Owner

The whole interaction around xdg-dbus-proxy is quite ugly, with the whole null-terminated argument pipe thing. It is also the only thing keeping the internal/helper package alive since the removal of bwrap. We might benefit from removing it altogether and implement it in-process.

The whole interaction around `xdg-dbus-proxy` is quite ugly, with the whole null-terminated argument pipe thing. It is also the only thing keeping the `internal/helper` package alive since the removal of `bwrap`. We might benefit from removing it altogether and implement it in-process.
ophestra pinned this 2025-11-05 22:38:33 +09:00
ophestra removed the
Kind
Feature
label 2025-11-10 01:29:15 +09:00
ophestra added a new dependency 2025-11-12 23:12:09 +09:00
ophestra added this to the v0.4 milestone 2025-12-19 02:52:25 +09:00
Author
Owner

This is very low priority, removed from v0.4 for now.

This is very low priority, removed from v0.4 for now.
ophestra removed this from the v0.4 milestone 2026-03-17 13:18:25 +09:00
Sign in to join this conversation.